Richard
Bannister--Sociology and Scienticism
Introduction
(I)
Scientific
sociology (ScS)
1)
confined to observable externals of human
behavior--inductionism--experience is the sole source of knowledge
(epistemology)--distinction between objects accessable to observation and those
not (ontological)
2)
apply rigorous methos in the production of social scientific
knowledge--by 30's satistics were method of choice
3)
strict neutrality in ethics and public policy
Certain
features are revealed by this methodology
1) focus on individual behavior rather than on
the formation and transformation of social structures--Anti-Marx
2) emphasis on inductive and incremental model
3) bureaucratic vision of team reasearch and
institutes
Form
of Objectivism
pre-war
sociology attempted to itself at service of society--Ward, Small--applied
sociology
the
interwar objectivist (O)--saw human volition and subjective consciousness as
having no place in social sciences--(O) must eliminate all referance to willing,
feeling self
Weberians
saw human science as requiring a different method from (NS)
MAIN
POINT: (O) was response to fear of social
fragmentation and disintegration felt in the years immediately before the
WWI--traces the emergence of (O) in prewar America
(II)
(O)
assumed two forms
1)
nominalist: Ogburn,
Chapin--(ScS) was nominalist, statistical and advisory--concerned with means,
not ends--society was name for collective response of individuals, so (ScS)
should limit itself to the measurement of change in behavior in response to
change in environment--study trends, not causes--limited to the how not why
2)
realist: Bernard--(ScS) was
realist and presumptively radical by providing "objective standards of
social control", hence ABSOLUTE STANDARDS FOR SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION--true
science required "projective logic" or imagination to posit an ideal
condition for standard
Chapter 1
Lester Ward (1839-1913)
By
1900, Ward's dynamic sociology gave way to division between pure (totally unconcerned with
"what society ought to be"--value-free) and applied (the province of social technicians--satistical studies)
In
30's he emerged as champion of humanism and reformism
Dynamic
Sociology (1883)
1)
attracted to notions of desire unrestrained, but also aware of its
uncontrolled nature
2)
feeling was a creative force--sociology is concerned with this
creativity, so dynamic
3)
opposed positivism--failed to provide true cause
4)
his early work is chapter in breakdown of Scottish realism and the Baconian
notion of Science which dominated America since 1830.
Hamilton saw
positivism as means between idealism and empiricism--experience was the source
of all knowledge but one could "sense" something beyond it.
For
Ward, Mill upset this mediation
Science,
by promising to uncover nature's secrets, rested on certainty of knowledeg
rather than, as positivism, certanity of method
Darwin's
natural selection challenged Victorian's notion of a mechanistic view of law
with a non-law--it also failed to provide a true cause--also made environment
all important
(IV)
Ward
believed that subjective and creative forces were controlable and
scientifically quanifiable as were
their manifestations--thus a radical subjectivity could produce ideal society
(V)
He
brought subjectivity into the realm of science by reducing consciousness to its
physical components.
Wund
rejected this--he made consciousness scientific without reducing it to
nonmental phenomena--"new
psychology"
Ward
believed in reform through education
(VI)
Pure
sociology:
dealt with genetic or non-telic phenomenon "unaffected by the purposeful
effort of man and society itself."--theoretical--ethically and politically
neutral.--this suggested Huxley's
universe of unconcerned with human values--bureacratic idea of disinterested
service--objectivity derived from nature of subject matter and the attitude of
observer, a position (O) accepted.--Bannister points out that Pure Sociology itself was not value-neutral
Applied
Sociology: treated telic and artificial
products--practical--concerned with means to changed society--his method showed
the efficacy of education, so became manifesto for education reform
Ward
replied to those who saw his non-valuing attitude as non-ethical he said cited
Bacon and Comte as saying all science is ethical--he critiqued Durkheim for purposing a sociology as a
science without a purpose
Ward's
world was one of oppositions--feeling/function, individual/society,
applied/pure sociology
Chapter 2
(I)
Albion Small
sought
a political middle ground
from
1890 to 1914 he was reknown--at Chicago--authored first textbook
He
attempted to dissolve all oppositions, to find a middle ground, unlike
Ward--not very successful
He
represents a transition from Ward's soical evolutionism to the antitheoretical
positivism of the interwar period--seen in 4 stages
1)
organic analogy: An Introduction to the Study of Society (1894)--social unity lay beyond powers of
observation--analogy between organism and society--Spencer--used to inspire activism--analogy
allowed him to reconcil concepts of science and objectivity--it was a
conceptual tool to understand social facts while providing a glimpse at the
underlying social unity--unity was given in experience as (CSP)
claimed--REJECTED: because of neo-Darwinian
debates of 1890's--Huxley's concept
of "evolutionary ethics" was being used to deny absolute in morality
or anything beyond individual wills--he wanted an absolute morality, being
trained as in (CSP)--he rejected biological sociology as having unfortunate
ethical and social consequences.--attacked Spencer--shifted from analogy to the
study of real social processes which may express real unity below surface
2)
process theory: Gerneral Sociology (1905)--a)
interest--building blocks of society--not immediately observable--beyond
individual unit--these interest seem to be expressing an absolute essence
across people and culture b) to satisfy interest, people formed
collisions then associations then institutions--c) increase complex of criss-cross interest--the social
process--groups rather than individuals are the fundamental units of
sociology--combines subjective and objective change from why things occurred to
how--description over causation and meaning--process theory was step toward transactional
analysis and political behavorism--Sheer description--idea of process replaced
analogy--sociologist could be objective without denying desires or interest,
since he studied these interests which constituted the moral order--so (ScS)ist was also (moral) reformer--helped to show
social unity--sociology as study of process of human association
3)
unified (SS)--each takes all of reality as its subject, but employes
different approaches--but each part of greater univeral which he called Science--each
perspective was particularistic and thus represented science--the
Science could be force to unify--like Bourne
4)
dissillusionment--politics made him think unity might not be
possible--saw his denial of essences as opening door for relativism--and said
that Science could not be absolute but one needed Faith.--Old certainty was
Gone
influenced
early on by Common Sense Philosophy
(CSP) and Baconian ideal of science (objective
method, anti-hypothesis--science collects and categorizes facts of experience--trace
phenomena to a true cause--reality accessible to the careful observer)
Believed
Sociology as master (SS)--could get at the social unity beyond perception
he
wanted a perspective above all class--result of Bemis affair
he
was overthrown by those who thought scientific methodology, not social reform,
had priority--Science was not sought after any longer--only science as a
set of procedures for studying a limited area of reality.--telos to technique
His
whole theories based on notion that things aren't what they appear to be....
Chapter 4
(I)
Rivalry
between Small and Giddings based on induction v. deduction, collectivism v.
individualism
Giddings
(1855-1929)--Columbia
unlike
Ward who saw objectivity deriving from non-telic nature of subject matter and
Small in terms of the observer, Giddings saw essence of science in method not
material.
social
Darwinist, individualist, statistics
believed
human will is free--but nature decides which volition will contribute to
survival
Marginalism--rooted value
in subjective judgemnt of utility, not labor expended in production--political
economy has sociological side--feeling was irrelevant
disliked
the notion of organization and state control--individualism or voluntarism was
best for society
Principles of
Sociology (1896)
1)
embraced evolution
2)
deductive
he
also bought Spencerian-Lamarckian notion of acquired traits
influenced
by Mach
1)
Scientific laws describe and anticipate phenomena
2)
refused to posit a reality behind appearance of phenomena
Giddings
saw thought human action was determined by a process of selection beyond
conscious control.--so dissections of desire (Ward) or interest (Small) were
pointless
He
was anti-Bacon--plurality of causes--led to subjectivism (was criticism) also
denied feelings
Chapter 5
converted
to pluralistic behaviorism by new method of satistics--a way to obtain
measurement and description without theory--"Correlation offered a looser
form of cause"
it
was a way to measure the amount of social control needed to hold society
together
heart
of social problems not poverty but social fragmentation--homogentity to
heterogenity
events
seemed to confirm this unravelling--no more standards of common decency--the
cause was the nations social diversity.--Bolshevism was final sign of total
disarray
after
the war, he gave up ever knowing the mind directly--only study action
modern
society needed engineers--(SS)ist became engineers
Chapter 6
William Graham
Sumner
(1840-1910)
he
maintained a value-free notion of sociology
he
turned to science, not as a praise of progressl, but as a substitute for
authority of traditions
opposed
metaphysics--redefined abstraction into concrete irrefutable material facts
out
of conviction that monopolies are natural and notions that group solidarity
were the keys to survival, he created a form of solidaritism called
“antagonistic cooperation”--he always appealled to facts
he
stressed objective study over philosophical doctrine--he demanded specifics and
particulars
Chapter 7
result
of current problems made Sumner into
relativist--embracing notion of folkways or the unconscious, formal patterns of
behavior manifested in society.
Began
to make distinction between “purposes” and “consequences” which led to
behaviorist stand.
Consequences
can be observed without being judged because they are beyond individual’s
control--they possess an objective quality and constitute mores or customs
he
expressed 3 main tenets of emerging (O)
1)
defined customs as facts apart from individual intention or desire
2)
the emergence of objective frame of mind within the mores
3)
collecting and classifying mores in Baconian tradition
Folkways
1)
Humanity is driven by the four basic instincts of love, vanity and fear
and hunger
2)
in all societies individuals tried to satisfy these needs the best they
could.
3)
certain methods prove more effective than others--
4)
these method become customs or Folkways
5)
folkways gain a moral sanction through a process of caparison and reflection
6)
mores are folkways which have become moral and fixed--they are facts
which have the authority of facts
7)
inductive method--science was both relative and absolute
8)
society must acknowledge the expert--embraced social engineering
9)
reforms of society must fit mores--relativistic
since
he rejected progress, modernization could not function as a promise of freedom
from relativism
Chapter 8
Luther Bernard (1881-1951)--behavioral sociology
He
wanted a more quantitative, research-oriented sociology
looking
for new standard he turned away from the middle class humanitarianism and
embraced social control and effiecencty notions.
converted
to behavorism--saw it as an assult on
traditional ways fo doing and feeling--”what we need is objectively tested fact
to replace our venerable traditions--feeling was an undependable resource--a
fear of moral and social choas inspired his search for social effieceny and for
“an objective standard of social control
His
relationship with democratic politics is problematic--he had a deep distrust of
democracy--he wanted rule by elite experts
freedom
and dignity were possible only by confirming group needs, determined by
scientiific means
became
a constructive relativist--if you control environment you can improve society
since individuals simply respond to
world around them
Chapter 10
Stuart Chapin (1888-1974)
became
a behaviorist and supporter of scientific neutrality
converted
to rigid scientism
embraced
Spengler notion of growth and decay and that it was sociology’s business to
meausre rates of change rather than explain them
believed
that social instituions could be reduced to a form of behavior--institutuions
consisted of 4 type-parts: attitudes,
symbols, utilitairan traits and specifications
“living
room scale--quantyfing household items--behavior rather than attitude are most
important
Chapter 11
William Ogburn
high
priest of (ScS)
sociology
not concerned with improving the world--it wanted only new knowledge
represents
transition figure--move from biology to culural analysis, from theory to
quantative research, from social evolutionism to nonteleological positivism
his
version of (O) is that he embraced a radical division of intellect and emotion
and public and private persons--he wanted to place feeling and emotion in
private sphere
cultural
lag--gap between belief and relality--moved beyond psychological by embracing
notin of culture which included material and nonmaterial--wanted it as a
response to biologism
Chapter 14
Read Bain (1892-1980)
said
that scientist were not just value-free but were prophets--wanted them to
become socially active
Howard Becker (1899-1960)
Science
was value-laden because he starts with belief in the value of prediction and
control as preconditions--control was absolute in scientific value--but this
should be the only value
Both
said they could work in Hitler’s Germany as a scientist
Bernard
thought science was ignoring social dimension--thought it was soft on fascism
Chapter 15
fascism
dispelled objectivism, like WWI dispelled reformism
Conclusion
thinkers
tried to draw connection between existing social values and the social order
1)
for pre-war functionalism, social institutions arouse to satisfy needs
in ways compatable with the well-being
of the individual and the survival of the group.--progressive evolutionism--it
was historical and humanist--believed the tradition of natural law and natural
rights were bankrupt
2)
emergence of (O) showed growing sense of social fragmentation and the
absence of common values and standards in the late Progressive era--Sumner,
Giddings,
Ogburn,
Bernard, Chapin--whereas language of Progressivism incorporated nostalgic long
for a pst social order, the language of effieciency, rationalization and social
engineering judged past as irrelevant.--It was also rejection and
secularization of Protestantism--by rejecting soul, behaviorist denied self,
general distrust of self and individual judgement--tried to regulate the
increasing experience of disorder--what made them different was not only their
concern for order and the authority of science but their belief that order
must be imposed from outside, with the help of experts--may have lead to
corporatism: decisions on social policy
be left to a coalition of government and corporate leaders, or that the
corporation be the model for orgianization and policy making--
(O)
arose at a time when there was growing interest in effiecnency, adjustment and
soical control--order over freedom and how society shapes individual
it
proposed to eliminate the arbitrary and the subjective from public life and
policy--science represented the only possible standard in an increasingly
pluralistic and fragmented society.