Varieties of Religious
Experience JPs book summary
by William James (1842 - 1910)
Don’t look to the bible for scientific truths
Geniuses are
doers. If genius and psycho possibly
religious leader. Bible maybe refuted
scientificallly. But not in terms of
value.
Most religious value be judged by 3 things 1)Immediate
luminousness 2)philosophical reasonableness and 3)moral helpfulness.
fetishism and
magic create inward piety (which may be primitive science as easily as early
religion.) Religion for this is
feelings, acts and experiences of individualness in their solitude. So far as they apprehend themselves to stand
in relation to whatever they may consider the divine (the divine being
associated with solemnity in which no distinctions can really be drawn). This is prescientific there is never a
question of degree or amount 44-46 compare marcus Auraleius and Germania
theologies sharing the zest in religion, the sublime beyond the mundane. Religion believes in order and adjusted
yourself to this universal order.
Beliefs elicit reactions often stronger than realized. Kant and Plato noted and gave proper reality
to these ideals that we live as if the were real. People often have religious experiences (mystical). Hedonism and if a creed makes one happy he
almost inevitably adopts it. Some are
always happy and see only good like Walt Whitman. Religion is scientifically proven true by mind cure. At least to that persons satisfaction. When I pray I get strength can and is proven
each day. Science gives us lights and
telephones. Religion gives mental and
moral poise, happiness and cures. There
are animal and regenerate forms of happiness.
Evil law be thought of as a mistake to be corrected or as intrindinct
and uneable on the whole latins take the former germanics take the latter. If so , might they need separate
religions? If fate is precarious. If we could have been born in different
situations isn’t our happiness a snicleer.
The greek and orientals acknowledge death and all as vanity. But the Greeks react masculinely and they
know not the joy ofthe adherents of Buuddhusm or islam or christianity. Epicurus sought mostly to to avoid
unhappines and strong joy which always brought an equal and opposite and so was
avoided. Stoics said the mordy good and
can get is free possession of eres soul.
All other goods are lies this is an earthly simple repirement
(epicurean) ormoral will (stoic) which seeks no unity on a higher plane. Historically rapturous joy comes from
radical pesssimism. Science may be
objective experiences subjective when one sees all horrible some say something
most be concealed, thus a search, often beginning in extacy begins. Tolstoy 150
3 examples: The vanity of mortal things sense a sin, fear of the universe. So we have the mind cure and the evil
view. The completest religion wouls
have both pessimism and deliverence.
Happy folks a re needed only to be once born. the sick twice internally
this struggle is epitomized by augustine.
Religion is one way of reconciling 1 or 2. Tolstoys resolution he found no justification for living in the
finite and so had to look to the infinite.
God is the only thing that keeps us 101yoi worth giving for. When the president goes fishing his agenda
and mind transform, not convert (PS
Tolstoy gets no happiness) Religious conversion is total reorder like that can
happen vialove, anger, jealousy guilt and remorse. This happens to many between the ages of 14, 17 as their world
view taked broadening leaps. Only
religious ones in adolescents are more intense and shorter than secular growth
spurts. Youth and drunkards have
conversion from sin with little or no doctrinal reference. Some are conversion feeling boysen (though
often are this type suprised) others convert by volition on self surrender. To
excercize the perfect will is to live in the region where the imperfect self is
the thing most emphasized. So surrender
is really needed. Psychology and
religion both say there is more than the conscious. But subconscious inside or force outside is where they part. Both require exhaustion conversion is often
accompanied by the ending bad habits and isolation now we percieve a mental
field which can be expanded or contracted. See all or only ones illness. If hes around us like a magnetic field
inside of which our center of energy turns like a compass needle.
Our whole past store of memories flloats around this margin. This line is vague so what is actual and is
potential is hard to say. Methodism and
revivalism assume 2 times birth are needed such a large change is naturally
seen as a miracle lights and voices are often heard. A sense of evil is needed for redemption. Has what is outside it is developed or or
has great potential it can burst into our daily lives (that outside our field
of cause). This may take the form of
automatic speech by writing and his seem oblivious in post hypnotic suggestions
results. Psychoanalysis has shown this
murky underworld. But this is not
degrading to the experience because again we cannot tell the eworth of
something by its origin. If it is good
then thats the conversion. it is to be
senemerated if it isn’t worth while we shouldn’t waste our time with it,
supernatural or not and it is nearly impossible to tell those converted from
those unconverted. Many non two
timeborn are as radiant. The question
is not how it happens but what is attained.
The subconscious maybe the way through which God reaches us. It is needed in the train ending of the
previously explained external control that oppress one. Three states associated with this 1)
assuredness that all is right 2) percieving truths previously not seen 3) an
objective change that newness beautifies
every object (the opposite of melancholy hallucinations and extreme
happiness. wow to the fruits religious
experience are amongst the best things history has to show, highest happiness
charity devotion trust and bravery. We
are constantly in the throw between yes and no. If there is a conflict anger or indignation are great at pushing
one over the top of another. Some
naturally have more access to these.
Someone with personal energy who is activated by spiritual enthusiasms
differ from his previous self in numerous ways. Obstaining saintiness (under view that selfish interest) belief
an ideal power existing and willingness to surrender to it an elation a loving yes-yes. This has the following practical
consequences 1) asceticism strength of soul sensitivity to spiritual discord
charity and tenderness (269) Stoicism hinduism buddhism and christianity stress
the wholeness. Loving enemies, cleaning
lepers, no fear and death. A stranger
moral transformation has within the last century, swept the western world. We no longer think that we are called on to
force physical pain with equinamity. Those who flagelate themselves bring fear,
not admiration. But it is good to court the arduous will accompanied by
reflective criticism habit, stimulus
innhibitions leaves a good or bad taste bringscharacter, texture and power
beyond smiles the worldliness and
passive happiness sainthood requires renunciationobedience and and poberty. sutor the obedience of ignatius layolas
obedience catholics have fixed definitions of man and his saintliness and
perfection. We cannot speak of the
value of saintliness without belief in the diety involved. But when we historically cease to admire orapprove,
what the definition and fuits of a diety are we toss it overboard. God used to need monarchy to inflict random
cruelty to seem soveriegn enough. The
need to placate by blood sacrifice we can no longer take seriously. They would have abhored our bland formless
pantheism. He will test the fruits
therefore by seeing whether or not the life style commends itself with our
reference to the god. This anyhow is
has it has always been adopted or discarded.
This provisionalism isn’t skeptical it is accepting our fallability and
doing something about it. We speak again of this personal experience which
often gets followers inmitiutions etc.
This experience often first begets isolation. Though much is accomplished
by one sidedness, we are thankfulfor diversity and needn’t feel bad that we
aren;t to unilaterally inclined. We appreciate reformers and michalangelo but
others ways as well. Often it is the
saints devotedness we honor and honoring him becomes the overiding concern to
where honoring of any other seems apostacy.
This leads to killing fanaticism is one bad of religion. 10th? century saints like theresa only cared
for what the lord would do for them and did nothing for others. To god purely concerned with minute accounts
of our shortcomins is too small for us.
Luther brought this to an end. So diverce fromintellectual concepts ains to hot. The next sainly virtue we find in excess is
purity. Not making only order in the
world or large, but obsessively in their own little world by excessive
purity. Not making only order in the
world at large, but obsessively in their own little world by excessive
purity. All of society must be avoided
in this pursuit. Minute monastic
management follows. Catholicism of the
16th century was not concerned with saving others or social righteousness, just
saving oneself. Concentraton on minutia
is seen in scholasticism. The next
areas of excess are charity and tenderness?
Turn the other cheek isn’t good in a world with evil. The whole history of constitutional
government is a commentary on the excellence of resisting evil. But not having such a vision for the future
would undoubtedly make it a worse world.
Belief in peoples worth was saved many.
They have saved us from spiritual stagnancy. The next topic is
asceticism. Those who concentrate on
total renunciation are still obsessed with the outide. We now have trouble relating. But it is valuable as a twice born
model of there being something wrong in
this world overcomeable by will and god not by ignoring it helps those in dire
circumstances be happy and knowing lifes tragic end though it is an escape not
a solution for all. It is a profound
way of handling the gift of existence.
Can we incorporate it is we view crass materialism? This is somewhat realized in war but
ascetics and warriors differ in that soldiers must weed out different
feelings. Poverty may be the strenuous
life out time lacks without crushing “weaker” people. we should sing the praises of poverty as many operate out of a
fear of it. Poverty to simplify and
save ones inner life. Scarceity not
scare city. Paying our way by what we
are or do , not have. Thing on this
tradition. Rich men cower at the
thought of poverty, can’t be happy unless their home is properly artistic. won’t have children until they have a big
bankroll and dread the fate of manual labor. How unmanly and irreligious. Not fearing poverty would give us strength
in unpopular causes, not fearing a loss of promotion, stocks falling etc. Fear of poverty among the educated class is
one of the worst moral diseases from which we suffer. 361-2 in their nichzie said we must fear those we pity more than
those we fear. The battle between he
and the saidn depends on whether we come from the seen or unseen. These can be more
than are ideal type of person. The
strong man is inferior because the weak man extrapointed makes you a higher
type of society. The world would be so
much worse without saints.. therefore we would do well to aspire towards
them.
Mysticism definition can be narrowed via the 4 following
1) ineffability 2) noetic meaning they also seem to be states of
knowledge and truth
the other 2 things less defined and essential are point of
it. 3) transciency it cannot be
sustained long. grasped by a supperior
power. There are levels of power from
the epiphany which comes when you finally get something you’ve heard many times
before to deja vu to trance to alchohol (whose grip on man is due to its power
to stimulate the mystical faculties). alchohol stimulates the yeses and unites
to the poor it fills the void of symphonies and literature. NO2 at least tells us these are
other states simultaneously. We fuse
with these different models as a hegelian dialectic. The present is pushed by the past and sucked by the future the
present is a forgone conclusion we are ever too late to understand it. No account of the universe can be given in
its totality which neglects mystical states but they are hard to include
because they are discontinuous with normal consciousness. The keyword of them all seems to be reconciliation
of opposition or oneness.